Archive for the ‘No nukes’ Category

New Film on Indian Point Explores ‘Nuclear Power in the Age of Fukushima’

April 17, 2015
Published on

Film alleges former nuke commission chair was ousted by pro-industry forces who thought he was being ‘too aggressive’ in his efforts to protect the public.

Indian Point sits on the east bank of the Hudson River in Buchanan, New York, just south of Peekskill. (Photo: Indian Point Film)

A new documentary, premiering Friday at the Tribeca Film Festival, provides a glimpse inside the aging nuclear plant known as Indian Point—as well as a slew of new arguments against nuclear power.

The 94-minute film, titled Indian Point and directed by Ivy Meeropol, features unprecedented footage of the three-unit nuclear power plant station, which was designed in the 1950s and sits in Buchanan, New York, just 35 miles up the Hudson River from Times Square.

In an interview, Meeropol said the film is “about one aging and controversial nuclear power plant in the age of Fukushima. The story is told from both inside and outside the plant, through characters who care deeply about its future.”

It delves specifically into the story of Gregory Jaczko, who was chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) when Japan’s Fukushima power plant suffered a major meltdown in 2013. The film alleges that Jaczko—an advocate of tightening safety controls at America’s aging nuclear facilities after the Fukushima disaster (his was the only dissenting vote on plans to build the first American nuclear plant in 30 years)—was ousted from the NRC by pro-industry forces who thought he was being “too aggressive” in his efforts to protect the public.

When asked by IndieWire what she wants people to think about after seeing the movie, Meeropol responded: “That there are consequences to our insatiable demands for energy and there are no easy answers for how to capture that energy safely. But even more pressing, since we are currently using nuclear power across the country and the globe, nuclear power plants must be regulated, and we need to be certain that our regulatory bodies are not compromised by their relationships with industry.”

The Daily Beast describes Indian Point as “a cautionary tale about a technology once seen as an abundant and non-polluting energy source, but with downsides that could make oil spills and electrical brownouts seem as minor as a fender bender.”

Just this week, the Disaster Accountability Project, a nonprofit organization that monitors responses to nuclear emergencies, called on the NRC to establish a 50-mile disaster warning zone for Indian Point. Currently, the NRC requires communities located within 10 miles of nuclear power plants to develop emergency plans.

But the Wall Street Journal reports that the NRC, “in response to the Disaster Accountability Project’s recommendations, said that the current 10-mile zone for emergency planning is appropriate and that plans in those areas will provide adequate protection to the public in a nuclear accident.”

Meeropol and Jaczko will participate in a Q&A following the film’s premiere on Friday evening.

Share This Article

The Real Nuclear Threat

April 10, 2015
Published on

An aerial view of the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico where the U.S. government continues to develop new and more powerful nuclear technology. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)

If war were only “itself” — the violence and horror, the conflagration and death — it would be bad enough, but it’s also an abstraction, a specific language of self-justifying righteousness that allows proponents to contemplate unleashing it not merely in physical but in moral safety.

War, the abstraction, is an instrument of policy, an “option” that can be waged or threatened to get one’s way. It is always contained and sure of itself, limited in its goals and, of course, necessary. Its unintended consequences are minimal and quickly neutralized with an official apology, then forgotten. If we didn’t forget, the next war wouldn’t seem like such a viable, enticing option.

The next war that has been gestating for so long now is the one with Iran, and its proponents, I’m sure, will do what they can to dismantle the framework of the agreement recently negotiated between Iran and the P5+1 nations. The incompleteness of the agreement — the fact that only Iran has accountability in the realm of nuclear weapons — raises profound questions about the future of the planet, but this flaw is obscured, certainly in most mainstream coverage, by the “controversy” that the agreement has been reached at all, supplanting the possibility of a military response to Iran’s nuclear energy program.

The interests opposed to the agreement, which wouldn’t be possible without mutual trust, maintain a belief in nothing but one-sided force to achieve their ends: either ongoing sanctions against Iran or military action.

Former Iranian diplomat Seyed Hossein Mousavian, interviewed recently by Democracy Now, noted that the sanctions have been “100 percent counterproductive,” causing an increase, not a reduction, in the Iranian nuclear program.

“Before sanctions,” he said, “Iran had a few hundred centrifuges. After sanctions, Iran reached to 22,000 centrifuges. Before sanctions, Iran had a few hundred kilograms of stockpile of enriched uranium. After sanctions, about 9,000 kilograms. Before sanctions, Iran was enriching below 5 percent. After sanctions, Iran increased the enrichment to 20 percent.

“. . . More pressure, more threat, Iran would become more aggressive. But if you go for mutual respect, negotiating with Iran based on mutual respect and based on international rules and regulations, you would find a very, very cooperative, a flexible Iran.”

Regarding the more extreme option, a military takeout, Robert Parry recently wrote at Consortium News: “Bombing Iran’s nuclear facilities could cause a massive human and environmental catastrophe, unleashing radiation on civilian populations and possibly making large swaths of Iran uninhabitable.”

Here we begin to get at the extreme recklessness and foolishness that is the context of so much geopolitical pontification. War is evoked with such brainless ease. A dozen years ago, Team Bush and its legion of political and media crusaders were screaming for the invasion of Iraq. One pseudo-argument for the invasion invoked World War II: We don’t want another Munich (where Hitler and British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain reached an agreement to allow Nazi Germany’s annexation of Czechoslovakia).

As Juan Gonzalez noted on Democracy Now, Republican Sen. Mark Kirk of Illinois recently dismissed the Iran agreement by proclaiming, “Minister Neville Chamberlain got a better deal from Adolf Hitler.” War and its justifications spring eternal. Scholar Peter Conolly-Smith, for instance, has pointed out that Munich has been invoked to justify virtually every American military action or threatened action since World War II: Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Grenada, Nicaragua, Iraq.

The icons of military righteousness are endlessly reusable. They’re never damaged, apparently, by the slaughter that follows in the wake of their invocation. But I suggest that hearing this justification for a potential new military action should alert one to the shallowness of the thinking behind it.

The deeper problem with the P5+1 agreement with Iran is not the controversy it has generated among the bomb-Iran contingent but the unacknowledged hypocrisy of the P5 nations — the U.S., Russia, China, Great Britain and France — which, of course, are all nuclear powers themselves. They have made no real effort to pursue global nuclear disarmament by getting rid of their own arsenals, as they agreed to do when they signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which went into effect in 1970.

Four and a half decades later, and despite the end of the Cold War, many thousands of nuclear weapons, in nine nations (also including Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea, none of which have signed the non-proliferation treaty), remain poised to destroy Planet Earth. The focus on the possibility that Iran might someday develop a nuclear weapon too, while perhaps not irrelevant to the goal of global disarmament, is a minute part of the enormous danger we’re in.

Indeed, the United States is in the process of investing billions of dollars — as much as $1 trillion over 30 years — to rebuild its whole nuclear arsenal, “including the warheads, and the missiles, planes and submarines that carry them,” according to Stephen Young of Union of Concerned Scientists, writing at Defense One.

And as Greg Mallo of the Los Alamos Study Group has noted, three privatized nuclear laboratories — Los Alamos, Sandia and Livermore — are behind the immense investment in upgraded, more destructive nuclear warheads. This aggressive pressure from the American business sector is a lot more frightening than any aggression emanating from Iran, and may indicate where the real push for war comes from. War is profitable to too many people. We need a peace treaty with the military-industrial complex.

Robert Koehler is an award-winning, Chicago-based journalist and nationally syndicated writer. His new book, Courage Grows Strong at the Wound is now available. Contact him at or visit his website

Kitty Litter Shuts Down Sole US Nuclear Weapons Waste Facility

April 8, 2015

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico. (photo: Albuquerque Journal)
The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico. (photo: Albuquerque Journal)

By William Boardman, Reader Supported News

07 April 15


U.S. nuclear weapons buildup ignores waste dangers

ow it’s official: using the wrong kitty litter can cause a severe and expensive nuclear accident at the nation’s unique underground radioactive waste containment facility, shutting it down indefinitely.

What’s NOT official yet is why the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) used organic kitty litter that caused the nuclear waste accident in the first place, or why LANL used that kitty litter in some 678 other drums of radioactive nuclear weapons waste now located at LANL and other locations. It’s also NOT official that the wrong kitty litter was deliberately and deceitfully used for more than a year. Nor is it yet clear why the federal government, having violated New Mexico environmental laws, refuses to pay the state $54 million in fines for federal law-breaking.

Last winter, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) appointed a Technical Assessment Team of independent experts from other government labs, and the team spent most of a year investigating the 2014 Valentine’s Day radiation-release accident at New Mexico’s federal Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP). On March 26, 2015, the team produced a 277-page report that concluded that radiation was released from the facility when a single container (Drum 68660) over-heated and failed because the nuclear weapons waste it contained was packed with the wrong kind of kitty litter. That kitty litter was “chemically incompatible” with the other contents of the drum, causing it to overheat, creating gases that forced open the lid in a “thermal runaway” that led to the spill that released radiation to the environment and that still renders a large section of the underground storage area lethal to humans.

The assessment team concluded that the February 14, 2014, drum failure took about 70 days to develop before the drum was breached. The accident released radioactive isotopes of Uranium, Plutonium, and Americium in uncertain amounts that are officially thought to be relatively small. As of early April 2015, Drum 68660 is the only drum that has failed. The experts determined that there were other containers in which radioactive waste was packed with the wrong kitty litter, and that any of these might fail, although they say they believe another failure is unlikely.

In part because the accident site remains largely inaccessible, the assessment team wrote that it “could not determine the cause of the drum breach with absolute certainty.”

Los Alamos National Laboratory’s multiple radiation risks continue  

While most of the drums of nuclear weapons waste laden with organic kitty litterare already underground at WIPP, there are an estimated 113 in temporary storage in Texas and 57 remaining at LANL. One of the drums at LANL is a “sibling drum” to the one that burst underground. The two drums were packed with waste from the same “parent drum” and with the same Swheat Scoop kitty litter, but other elements of their contents were slightly different. The drum still at LANL is monitored for heat and remains intact. LANL has shipped more than 1,000 drums of waste to WIPP since it opened in 1999. Remaining LANL waste stored above ground on-site was threatened by wildfire in 2011 and remains near an earthquake fault line.

The DOE assessment team did not address the question of why the waste packing process at Los Alamos stopped using non-organic kitty litter as usual and switched to Swheat Scoop. The World Nuclear Association, an industry group in London, explains the kitty litter mix-up by saying: “The DOE did not specify its preferred brand…. However, SwheatScoop happens to be made from wheat and therefore contains carbohydrates which provided fuel for a chemical reaction with the metal nitrate salts being disposed of.” Each 55-gallon drum of nuclear waste typically includes about 50 pounds of kitty litter.

Rumors that the accident at WIPP was caused by the wrong kitty litter used by LANL surfaced soon after it happened. In May 2014, New Mexico’s Environment Department secretary, Ryan Flynn, issued a formal order to LANL to secure the drums with the wrong kitty litter, saying in part:

Based on the evidence presented to NMED, the current handling, storage, treatment and transportation of the hazardous nitrate salt bearing waste containers at LANL may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to health or the environment.

Was LANL cutting safety corners to cut costs?

In November 2014, after a six-month investigation, the Santa Fe New Mexicanportrayed LANL as behaving either incompetently, or with reckless disregard for safety, or with something like criminal negligence – perhaps a mixture of all three. Motivating LANL malfeasance, the paper suggests, was the desire of the private contractors running the lab to meet the June 30, 2014, deadline for clearing waste from the site, thereby protecting and extending its $2.2 billion annual operating contract with the U.S. Energy Department as well as another $80 million a year for managing LANL.

Like so much of the U.S. nuclear weapons program, LANL is a cozy, profitable, corporate-welfare monopoly for a private consortium calling itself Los Alamos National Security. The Delaware Limited Liability Company was formed eight years ago by four entities: Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services, URS Energy and Construction, Bechtel, and the University of California. As stated in its by-laws, the company purpose is “to manage and operate the Los Alamos National Laboratory in a manner that furthers the interests of the national security and advances the DOE/NNSA missions, programs and objectives in accordance with the terms of the Prime Contract.” In other words, it is a privately held national security profit center that, according to Bloomberg, “engages in the businesses of nuclear defense programs, facilities management, science and technology to homeland security challenges, and safety and security.”

Los Alamos National Security LLC is, by its very nature, a limited liability conflict of interest in which at least one conflict is between profit and security.

Santa Fe New Mexican lays out tough case against LANL

As viewed by the New Mexican, the parent company, Los Alamos National Security, allowed its employees at LANL to take numerous actions that could protect the company’s profits by risking the security of others. The gambit appears to have failed by just one drum. Its elements, perpetrated or allowed by LANL employees or contractors, included, according to the New Mexican:

    • … workers packaging the waste came across a batch that was extraordinarily acidic, making it unsafe for shipping. The lab’s guidelines called for work to shut down while the batch underwent a rigid set of reviews to determine how to treat it, a time-consuming process that jeopardized the lab’s goal of meeting the deadline. Instead, the lab and its various contractors took shortcuts in treating the acidic nuclear waste, adding neutralizer and a wheat-based organic kitty litter to absorb excess liquid.
    • Documents accompanying the drum, which were supposed to include a detailed description of its contents … made no mention of the acidity or the neutralizer, and they mischaracterized the kitty litter as a clay-based material – not the more combustible organic variety that most chemists would have recognized as hazardous if mixed with waste laden with nitrate salts….
    • Documents and internal emails show that even after the radiation leak, lab officials downplayed the dangers of the waste – even to the Carlsbad managers whose staff members were endangered by its presence – and withheld critical information from regulators and WIPP officials investigating the leak.
    • The waste container that ultimately burst would not have met federal transportation standards to get on the road from Los Alamos to Carlsbad, nor would it have been accepted at WIPP, if its true ingredients had been reported by the lab.
    • In documents filed with the New Mexico Environment Department before the accident, LANL reported that the waste in the drum that would later burst “is stable and will not undergo violent chemical change without detonating,” and “there is no indication that the waste contains explosive materials, and it is not capable of detonation or explosive reaction. The materials in the waste stream are therefore not reactive wastes.
    • LANL has never publicly acknowledged the reason it switched from clay-based litter to the organic variety believed to be the fuel that fed the intense heat.
  • Organic kitty litter may have been mixed in up to 5,565 containers of waste at LANL starting in September 2012 that were incorrectly labeled as holding inorganic litter, according to an assessment conducted by WIPP personnel.

LANL did not respond to inquiries by RSN seeking an explanation for the change from inorganic to organic kitty litter during 2012-2014.

Commenting on the story in the New Mexican, Greg Mello of the Los Alamos Study Group wrote in part: “The treatment processes LANS [the LLC] used were illegal as well as dangerous. Shipping the waste was illegal. Providing the fallacious manifest that accompanied the drums was illegal. Failing to provide accurate information after the fact when NMED asks for it was and is illegal.”

In the most recent study group bulletin, Mello notes that not every misdeed in the nuclear world will reach the public and cites an example from December 2014 when eight people at LANL were apparently contaminated with Plutonium but there was no news coverage.

Nuclear safety is an expensive mirage, all for the sake of nuclear war

The cost of failure of the single drum contaminated with organic kitty litter will almost surely run into the hundreds of millions of dollars. WIPP alone estimates its recovery plan will cost at least $500 million, and an additional $200 million or so for an improved, new ventilation system. These estimates do not include the additional costs of holding the nuclear waste stream while WIPP is closed, or the cost of improvement and compliance at LANL or any other facility.

When it opened in 1999, WIPP was supposed to have a 10,000 year leak-proof design life protecting the public from nuclear weapons waste radiation. That design life turned out to be only 15 years of safety, although further releases of radiation since Valentine’s Day 2014 have apparently been limited.

The Department of Energy says it is committed to reopening WIPP by March 2016, at least for partial operation, but that’s uncertain, since no one has ever tried to fix an underground nuclear waste facility before. Meanwhile, the ceiling of the underground salt cave had a significant collapse in January, when a section of ceiling 8 feet by 8 feet and two feet thick fell in a non-contaminated section of the one square mile storage area. As WIPP management acknowledged at the time: “This event highlights the need to continue prioritizing roof bolting and ground control in both the contaminated and uncontaminated areas of the WIPP underground facility in order to ensure safety and habitability in the underground. This area was originally scheduled to be re-bolted during the annual outage in February 2014.”

In March, more than a year after Drum 68660 burst, decontamination of the underground area began, as reported by WIPP: “Employees are using a modified piece of agricultural spraying equipment that allows them to apply a fine water mist to the walls and floor. The water dissolves the salt and washes it down to the floor. When the salt recrystallizes, it encapsulates the contamination and prevents any resuspension of radioactive particles.”

And now the federal government has reversed its past practice of paying fines for violating state laws and regulations. In December 2014, New Mexico’s Environment Department levied a total of $54 million in fines on the federal (outsourced) operations at WIPP ($17.7 million) and LANL ($36.6 million). Now the Energy Department is taking the position that it would be illegal to pay New Mexico’s fines, even though it has done so in the past. New Mexico is reportedly preparing a new order against WIPP, LANL, and others with fines totaling $100 million.

Underlying this struggle over the safety of nuclear weapons waste is the Obama administration’s perpetuation of longstanding reliance on a massive nuclear weapons force comprising more than 7,500 warheads, more than 2,000 of which are presently deployed around the world. The Obama administration has embarked on a program of improving and expanding the American nuclear force. A key element of that program is the fabrication of Plutonium pits (nuclear bomb triggers).

Making these essential elements of American weapons of mass destruction has been assigned to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, even though LANL has demonstrated its ability and willingness to gamble on lying about using the wrong kitty litter.

William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.


What if US & UN Sanctioned Israel Over Its Nukes the Way They Did Iran?

April 4, 2015

Benjamin Netanyahu giving speech about danger of Iran's nuclear program at UN. (photo: Don Emmart/AFP/Getty)
Benjamin Netanyahu giving speech about danger of Iran’s nuclear program at UN. (photo: Don Emmart/AFP/Getty)

By Juan Cole, Informed Comment

04 April 15


here is a lot of talk about nuclear proliferation in the Middle East and the ways in which an Iranian bomb would provoke Saudi Arabia and others to acquire nuclear warheads of their own.

But for decades, the primary impetus to a nuclear arms race in the region has been Israel, which probably had an atom bomb by about 1970. It was helped behind the scenes by France and Britain– which actively proliferated nuclear weapons to Israel.

It was Israel’s bomb that, in part, impelled Iraq to go for broke. Iraq’s nuclear weapons program of the 1980s in turn convinced some in Iran that Iran needed at least a nuclear break-out capacity if two of its enemies were going to have bombs. Since Israel destroyed an Iraqi light water reactor, OSIRAK, in 1981 (which had been built by the French and could not easily have been used to produce fissile material), when Iran began its experiments in uranium enrichment, it kept them secret lest Tel Aviv send out F-14s.

Ideally, the whole Middle East should be an atomic bomb- free region. The area has enough horrible problems without a weapon of mass destruction. But the UN Security Council has treated Israel very differently from the way they treated Iran. For centuries, Europeans have been held to different standards and different rules than have peoples of the Global South. Israel as a “European” country was allowed to get a nuclear bomb, indeed was helped to do so, and no sanctions were ever applied to it. Iran was targeted for economic warfare just for having an enrichment program.

Now that Iran is being constrained by a strict inspections regime and limitations on centrifuges from ever weaponizing its civilian enrichment program, what if the United Nations Security Council turned its attention to decommissioning Israel’s stock of several hundred warheads?

If Britain, France, Russia, China and the USA decided Israel would have to give up its nukes, as a means of ensuring non-proliferation in the Middle East, how would they proceed?

On analogy from the sanctions imposed on Iran, we could see the UNSC pass a resolution demanding that Israel sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (as Iran has).

Then they demand that Israel allow inspectors in to Dimona.

Then they demand that Israel destroy its stockpile of atomic bombs.

When Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu loudly and cheekily defies the world body, the UNSC moves to the next stage.

The European Union, with which Israel does a third of its trade, begins boycotting Israeli-made goods and Israeli companies.

China joins suit, drastically reducing its imports from Israel and curtailing contracts to Israeli firms.

As Netanyahu’s defiance grows louder and more strident, and he begins threatening the five permanent members of the Security Council, the UNSC takes a dim view of his bluster.

Israel is kicked off the SWIFT bank exchange and excluded from the alternative Chinese one. Israeli foreign trade plummets as sellers find it impossible to receive shekels for the goods they send to Israel. It is difficult to buy Israeli products because there is no easy way to pay Israeli businesses for them. Buyers turn to other producers of similar products in other countries.

Israeli exports are cut in half. The country is forced to trade with some poor Asian and African countries that do no care about the UNSC, but must barter for their inferior made goods.

The shekel falls from roughly $.25 to only an American dime. The Israeli middle class can suddenly no longer afford to vacation in Europe or the United States. Egyptian and Turkish beaches are off limits because those countries joined the boycott, hoping for a denuclearized Middle East.

Haaretz runs an editorial pointing out that Israel has an American nuclear security umbrella and asking why the country needs its own stockpile.

Netanyahu stages a photo op standing atop stacked nuclear warheads, waving a cowboy hat above his head in imitation of Slim Pickens in the film, “Dr. Strangelove.”

The shekel falls to five cents against the dollar. Israelis find it difficult to afford some important medicines because of their high cost, and some patients die as a result. Many Israelis begin moving to France, Germany and Sweden, tired of trying to scrape a living together in an increasingly dilapidated Tel Aviv, beset with potholes and crumbling buildings.

In new elections, Isaac Herzog becomes prime minister and announces a willingness to negotiate with President Michelle Obama’s Secretary of State.

The Security Council insists that Israel sign the NPT and accept wide-ranging and surprise IAEA inspections. The destruction of its stockpile of atomic bombs begins.

Other Middle East states, having seen what happened to Iran and Israel, affirm that they have no interest in nuclear weaponry. Most now in any case get their power not from reactors but from solar farms, which generate electricity at 2 cents a kilowatt hour. Cheap power and fewer military expenses have made them prosperous. They implore Israel to join their ranks and also to accept the 2002 Arab League peace plan.


Comment: We must be freed from the most imminent threat of nuclear holocaust (by accidents, mishaps, failures, terrorism, wars) by treating every country equal (free zones in the Middle East, South Asia, East Asia, Europe, and America. We need the natural cyclical Indra-net culture (cultivation with 5 blisses: awakening/freedom/equality/love/peace) to stop the artificial uni-directional pyramidal civilization (urbanization for matter/power with moneyism/militarism/me-ism with 5 calamities: delusion/bondage/discrimination/exploitation/extermination).


March 23, 2015
   No to the restart of Takahama Nuclear Power Plant!
The government and the power company, ignoring the public opinion and the  jurisdiction, are steadily promoting the restart of a number of nuclear power plants including the Takahama Power Plant in Fukui Prefecture. But, the chance to stop the restart of them is coming up to our citizens at the end of this month. Together Let’s grab that chance. The Fukui District Court has ordered to stop the restart of the Oi Nuclear Power Plant last May. Many people welcomed this judgement facing the damage of the Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant accident straight from the front and ascertained the essential risk of nuclear power plant itself. But, Kansai Electric Power is ignoring this ruling, without waiting for the conclusions on its appeal immediately made, is trying to restart the Oi Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3 & 4 and Takahama Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3 & 4. So, many local citizens and lawyers have filed the Fukui District Court for a provisional disposition instructions to stop the restart of Takahama Nuclear Power Plant immediately to take effect,  And the decision is expected finally at the end of this month. Let us now rise up together to let people know that the local citizens and lawyers but also so many citizens all over the country are opposing the restart of Takahama Nuclear Power Plant unable to ensure its safety. Please sign immediately – Avaaz will collect as many signatures as possible by the day of the notification of the decision and brings our voices directly to the local people :

Signed petition
Kansai Electric Power and Japan Atomic Power recently decided to decommission their nuclear power plant, 3 units, outdated beyond the 40 years from the start of operation. The Mihama Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1 & 2 in Fukui Prefecture and the Tsuruga Unit 1 in the same Prefecture will be the first decommissioning, after defining a new standard for the the operation period of the nuclear power plant “40 years in principle” after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident. But, at the same time, Kansai Electric Power has applied the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for their review that is the premise of restart of the Takahama Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3 &  4, which also passed 40 years from the start of their operation.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, following Sendai nuclear power plant in Kagoshima Prefecture, published a conformity assessment certificate based on the new regulatory standards and issued the installation change permission for the Kansai Electric Takahama nuclear power plant Unit 3 & 4 on February 12. They seem to allow the restart of sufficiently profitable nuclear power plants like Takahama’s, even if the decommissioning is old and low powered nuclear power plants are decommissioned. In other words, the safety of the citizens is ignored. But, now that the majority of people are opposed to the restart of the nuclear power plants, forcing the restart is the act of ignoring the respect for democracy.
If the Fukui District Court decides the provisional disposition order of the suspension of restarting Takahama nuclear power plant, it will prove that the civil and judicial power can stop the restart of nuclear power plants. Let us rise up together towards the favorable ruling of Fukui District Court of this month lest nuclear power plants restart without ascertaining the safety of citizens! Please sign urgently – Avaaz will bring your voices directly to the local residents fighting at site until the decision notice. 
Avaaz community stood up hoping for the future without nuclear power plants many times, since the accident of Fukushima nuclear power plant. Immediately after the accident, we asked the government for the world without the threat of nuclear power plants for mothers and children in Fukushima and last year to listen to the people’s wishes and not to restart Sendai nuclear power plant. Fukui District Court’s provisional disposition decision of the day after tomorrow is a big chance for the zero nuclear power plant – Let rise together with the local residents and lawyers.
With great hope and determination

Alex, Rosa, Juei, Lewis and Avaaz team,

Related information

District Court Decision on Injunction Litigation about Restart of Takahama Nuclear PP (Asahi Shimbun / Japanese)

Decommissioning Decision on Mihama Unit 1 & 2 , Tsuruga Unit 1  (Tokyo Shimbun / Japanese)

Review Application for Takahama Unit 1 & 2 and Mihama Unit 3  (NHK / Japanese)

Nuclear PP Controversy, locally windless also (Asahi Shimbun / Japanese)

Report on Date of 2nd Trial Questioning on Oi-Takahama Provisional Injunction ( Nationwide Lawyers Liaison Committee / Japanese) is a network of the world 41 million people to expand the campaign.
 Through this network, we are working so that the ideas and values ​​of people around the world are reflected in the global decision-making (“Avaaz” in various languages, it means “voice” or “song”). Members of Avaaz, you Moi in any country around the world. The staff team of Avaaz, the six continents in 18 countries, we are developing activities in 17 languages. Avaaz has succeeded so far campaign here from, also Facebook and Twitter See also.
E-mail address, display language, If you want to change the settings of other personal information, click here please contact us from. Click here if you wish to stop mail delivery , please.

If you contact the Avaaz, This e-mail rather than being returned directly, here do you contact from, call (+1) 888-922-8229 to (US) Please contact Te.

Historic opportunity to stop the re-start of nuclear power plants

March 22, 2015


The historic chance has come around to end the re-start of nuclear power plants now in reality by citizens and judicial power. Kansai Electric Power is working now steadily for the re-start of Takahama genpatsu in Fukui Prefecture, but a large number of local residents has filed for a provisional disposition injunction to Fukui District Court. Last May the court ruled the injunction ruling once already Oi genpatsu in the same prefecture. Now let us citizens stand up lest our safety is not endangered by the re-start of the nuclear power. Please sign the following immediately:

Signed petitionclick for signatures

The government and the power company is currently ignore public opinion and justice, steadily promoting the re-operation of a number of nuclear power plants, including the Takahama genpatsu in Fukui Prefecture. At the end of this month the chance for us citizens to prevent the re-start of the power is coming up. Together let’s grab that chance.

Fukui District Court has ordered the suspension of Oi genpatsu re-start last May. Many citizens welcomed this judgment faces the damage of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident and ascertained the essential risk of nuclear power plant itself, . But, Kansai Electric Power will ignores this ruling, without waiting for the appeal of the conclusions, offers to immediately to re-start the Oi  genpatsu Unit 3 & 4 and Takahama genpatsu Unit 3 & 4. So, many local citizens and lawyers has filed a provisional disposition instructions to obtain the injunction of Takahama genpatsu to stop the re-start  the Fukui District Court to immediately take effect. And the decision is expected to be finally made at the end of this month.

Now, not only the people of local citizens and lawyers, but a lot of citizens much from across the country, or to convey our firm opposition against the re-start of safety of Takahama genpatsu not guaranteed, let’s rise up together. Please sign immediately – Avaaz collects as many signatures as possible and will deliver our voices directly to our local people before the date of the decision notice, .

Kansai Electric Power and Japan Atomic Power recently decided to decommissioning of nuclear power plant 3 groups outdated from the start of operation beyond the ’40. Fukui Prefecture Mihamagenpatsu No. 1, Unit 2 and the prefecture Tsuruga Unit 1 of decommissioning, after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, the operation period of the nuclear power plant after defining a new standard for the “principle ’40”, for the first time of decommissioning will be. But at the same time, Kansai Electric Power has applied for a review that is the premise of re-operation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for Takahamagenpatsu No. 1, Unit 2, which also passed 40 years from the start of operation.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 12, followed by Kagoshima Prefecture Sendai nuclear power plant, for Unit 3 & 4 Kansai Electric Takahama nuclear power plant, and published a conformity assessment certificate based on the new regulatory standards, issued the installation change permission. Even if the decommissioning is low power nuclear power plant out the old, primary sufficient profit has been promised as Takahamagenpatsu is, our policy is also to re-running no matter how old. In other words, the safety of the citizens I postpone a. But, now that the majority of people are opposed to the re-running of the nuclear power plant, that it forces the re-operation is the act to undermine the democracy respect.

If, if the Fukui District Court Kudase the provisional disposition order of re-running suspension of Takahamagenpatsu, will be proven to be able to prevent the re-running of the nuclear power plant in the civil and judicial power. So that the nuclear power plant remains safety is not ensured civil unexpected is re-running, we also let rise together towards the ruling of this month of Fukui District Court! Please sign immediately – Avaaz is delivered directly to your residents to fight in the field until the day of the decision notice.

Avaaz community, first nuclear power plant since the accident in Fukushima, many times stood up hope future without nuclear power. Immediately after the accident, a world without threat of nuclear power plant for mothers and children Fukushima, and the last year so as not to re-run the Sendai nuclear power plant to listen to public opinion, and asked the government. Provisional disposition decision of the day after tomorrow in Fukui District Court, is a big chance for the primary zero – Let rise along with the local residents of you and lawyers.

And with great hope and determination

Alex, Rosa, Juei, Lewis and Avaaz team,

Related information

Concluded re-running injunction litigation District Court of Takahamagenpatsu (Asahi Shimbun / Japanese)

Mihama 1,2 issue, Tsuruga No. 1 nuclear power plant 3 groups decommissioning decision (Tokyo Shimbun / Japanese)

Takahamagenpatsu Units 1 and 2 and Mihamagenpatsu Unit 3 review the application (NHK / Japanese)

Primary controversy, also local windless (Asahi Shimbun / Japanese)

Ohi-Takahamagenpatsu injunction temporary injunction 2nd trial fathom date your report (de primary lawyers nationwide Liaison Committee / Japanese) is a network of the world 41 million people to expand the campaign.
Through this network, we are working so that the ideas and values ​​of people around the world are reflected in the global decision-making (“Avaaz” in various languages, it means “voice” or “song”). Members of Avaaz, you Moi in any country around the world. The staff team of Avaaz, the six continents in 18 countries, we are developing activities in 17 languages. Avaaz has succeeded so far campaign here from, also Facebook and Twitter See also.
E-mail address, display language, If you want to change the settings of other personal information, click here please contact us from. Click here if you wish to stop mail delivery , please.

If you contact the Avaaz, This e-mail rather than being returned directly, here do you contact from, call (+1) 888-922-8229 to (US) Please contact Te.


A Clean Energy Future Is Possible: A Message for the 4th Anniversary of Fukushima

March 15, 2015
Published on

‘The Fukushima disaster shows us exactly why we cannot and should not try to rely on nuclear energy to solve the climate crisis.’

“Ringing the bell on climate change.” (Photo: Light Brigading/flickr/cc)

Just ahead of the four-year anniversary of the Fukushima disaster, five organizations have issued a message that the only way to avert climate disaster is by embracing a clean energy future.

It was March 11, 2011 when the Great East Japan earthquake caused a massive tsunami which triggered a triple meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant and destroyed thousands of lives and livelihoods.

Signs that the disaster is ongoing are clear: nearly a quarter-million Japanese people arestill displaced, radioactive trash has piled up in the affected region, radiation levels remain elevated, and clean-up efforts at the plant continue amid leaks.  And despite public opposition, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe continues his push to restart nuclear plants.

But “there is a better way,” the Make Nuclear History website states.

The new site, which offers a humorous new video launched by the organizations—Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Nuclear Information and Research Service (NIRS), Public Citizen and Sierra Club—adds: “There is a way to power our lives without fossil fuels. There is a solution to climate change without nuclear energy. There is a future where we can solve the climate crisis and power our lives from 100 percent renewable sources and energy efficiency. Now is the time to create our fossil and nuclear-free future.”

“Now is the time to create our fossil and nuclear-free future.”The interactive video shows three energy paths—fossil fuels, nuclear energy and renewable energy—to highlight the problems, like higher carbon footprints and environmental and health impacts, of failing to switch to wind and solar.

The projected future under the fossil fuel and nuclear energy scenarios are depicted as apocalyptic.

“If the goal is heading off climate change, nuclear power and next generation fossil fuels are just an expensive and dangerous distraction,” the video’s renewable champion states.

The new site also invites viewers to take action on specific campaigns from the groups, like Public Citizen’s campaign to urge the NRC to enforce a dozen safety recommendations for nuclear reactors that were issued after the Fukushima disaster; and Sierra Club’s campaign to urge members of Congress to phase out nuclear power and commit to 100% renewable energy.

“The Fukushima disaster shows us exactly why we cannot and should not try to rely on nuclear energy to solve the climate crisis,” said Tim Judson, Executive Director of NIRS. “Japan’s decision to invest in nuclear rather than renewables left the country totally unprepared when calamity struck. Clean, renewable energy sources are abundant, affordable, and ready to go. They can replace nuclear and fossil fuels, which are two sides of the dirty, extreme energy coin.”

Greenpeace Executive Director Annie Leonard adds: “The Fukushima disaster is a constant reminder that nuclear energy is a dirty and dangerous distraction from real solutions like wind and solar. We should commit to rejecting costly nuclear pipe dreams and supporting the renewable efforts that can help avert our climate crisis.”

Watch the introductory video below:

Share This Article

Fukushima had “meltdown

March 11, 2015


Video: , Fukushima had “meltdownmelt-through, and melt-out within a few days of quake” — US Gov’t: Analysis shows containment vessel failed after fuel “melted through” barrier — Experts: Corium may have melted out into reactor building, prepare for radiation levels over 200,000,000 microsieverts per hour (VIDEO)

Posted: 10 Mar 2015 01:15 AM PDT


Comment: The world is melting down! Are you melting down?

3 U.S. Nuclear War Labs Should Be Shut

March 7, 2015
General News 3/6/2015 at 10:30:40

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ;; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Become a Fan
(45 fans)
NEW YORK—The nation’s three privatized nuclear warhead laboratories are bloated, redundant, stand in the way of progress on real 21st century security issues, and should be shut down, a conference on peace and security here was told.
“These privatized labs have become a considerable racket” and this year will consume more than $4 billion for their nuclear weapons activities, said Greg Mello, Executive Director of the Los Alamos Study Group (LASG), of Albuquerque, N.M., which tracks their activities.
The laboratories are the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in Los Alamos, N.M., the Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) in Albuquerque, NM, and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in Livermore, CA. Civil society’s disarmament’s efforts since the demise of the Soviet Union “have all foundered in substantial part because they failed to realize the central importance of attenuating and then eliminating the political power of these laboratories,” Mello said.
The laboratories are pushing “an ambitious plan to replace all current warheads and (nuclear) bombs with redesigned models” that will actually make them more destructive, threatening further to destabilize our relationship with Russia, and with their new delivery systems will cost taxpayers over time more than an estimated one trillion dollars, Mello said.
In a talk Feb. 28th to the Helen Caldicott Foundation conference on “The Dynamics of Possible Nuclear Extinction” in the New York Academy of Medicine, Mello said the labs “are the primary institutions through by which corporate prerogatives have replaced government decision-making in the nuclear weapons arena.”
“The labs were given sweeping new powers in 1996,” Mello recalled, and since 2006 all are fully privatized. “They now wield enormous policy power by a variety of means both crude and subtle, direct and indirect, and they do not hesitate to blackmail government whenever that power is threatened.”
Nuclear weapons should be banned, as dozens of countries are now considering, Mello said, “and the nuclear weapons laboratories should be closed entirely as part of such a ban.” “After 25 years of close examination of the labs,” he continued, “we have finally concluded, and for the first time, that the labs have no unique role in disarmament, nonproliferation, verification, cleanup, intelligence, or in any other mission” that cannot be performed “more objectively, cheaper, and better” by other institutions. All government-led and civil society efforts at reform have failed.
Privatization deepened the conflict of interest at the labs, since now the three labs’ directors corporate officers have a legal responsibility to advise the Secretary of Energy and the President regarding the (nuclear) stockpile while also having a legal responsibility to bring in more business, Mello warned. “What’s more,” he pointed out, “The corporations are fully indemnified and protected from the consequences of their many failures, misuses of funds, violations of law, and accidents, and they have never paid a dime for any of these.”
“It is now critically important,” Mello concluded, “to dethrone the nuclear weapons laboratories now in public, in the executive branch, and in congressional eyes to prepare for disarmament — to expose the transgressive nature of nuclear weapons institutions right along with nuclear weapons themselves. If we don’t, we won’t be able to grapple with the real problems this country faces.”
In 2002, Prior to his current position, Mello was a Visiting Research Fellow at Princeton’s Program of Science and Global Security.
The conference at which Mello spoke comes at a time when tensions between Russia and the U.S. are escalating. “As the Cold War heats up again, the U.S. and Russia maintain over 1,000 weapons on hair-trigger alert to be launched with a press of a button,” says Dr. Caldicott, an Australian pediatrician who has become perhaps the most prominent opponent of nuclear war and nuclear power.
Between them, Dr. Caldicott says, “the U.S. and Russia possess 93% of the world’s 16,400 nuclear weapons arsenal — a situation which is made worse by outdated equipment, negligence, poor maintenance, viruses, and hacking within the arsenals of both countries.” -30-


Sherwood Ross worked as a reporter for the Chicago Daily News and contributed a regular “Workplace” column for Reuters. He has contributed to national magazines and hosted a talk show on WOL, Washington, D.C. In the Sixties he was active as public (more…)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

US Gov’t: Radioactive material from reactors is 2 billion times more toxic than industrial poisons — Harm caused by nuclear disaster “greater than for any work of man” other than atomic bomb

March 1, 2015


US Gov’t: Radioactive material from reactors is 2 billion times more toxic than industrial poisons — Harm caused by nuclear disaster “greater than for any work of man” other than atomic bomb — Top Expert: Radiation “like explosions going off in cell… blows hole in DNA” (VIDEO)

Posted: 28 Feb 2015 06:05 PM PST


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 90 other followers